Search for: "State v. Scales"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 4,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 9:01 am
Hands-free control of your smart phone not only makes good sense, it is the law in more and more states. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Yesterday’s second grant, in Lozman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
At what point along the juridical richter scale are owners of regulated smokestacks that release chemicals into the air immune from the very basic principles of property, tort and environmental law. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am
The last time we covered the progress of the case that I’ll call Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
Partnering with the bar associations of all 50 states and the District of Columbia, Fastcase serves more than 1.1 million lawyers worldwide. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:11 am
The Eighth Circuit’s Analysis Ojogwu v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:50 am
Witnesses underscored the importance of Section 13(b), noting that if the FTC were forced to scale back its litigation efforts, consumers would face more deceptive claims and states would need to shift resources to secure relief for consumers. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:40 am
Lost tourism and convention dollars will enlist powerful allies in-state for scaling back or repealing the law. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In Rodgers v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm
(Just be sure not to incur out-out-network costs that don't count toward out-of-pocket maximums.)But you can get cost-sharing subsidies to cover some of that expense, based on a sliding scale slightly different than the premium assistance tax credit scale. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
Indeed, one is now beginning to see that way that private actors are attempting to use the methods of data driven governance to hold state and state systems accountable. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
See Volusia County v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:26 am
It was a small scale event held to facilitate discussion between judges, practitioners, court staff and academics, held under Chatham House rules. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
The blog is delighted to host an online symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 8:00 am
United States - see S2KM's Murphy wiki Arkansas DHS v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
In summary, their Lordships’ view in M was taken as follows:Both the passages last cited emphasise that there must be a need for care and attention at the time of the provision of the supported accommodation, though in the case of a progressive illness, or physical or mental state which is liable to deteriorate without care, it can be a small-scale need at the outset. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Serra v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
In Biomedino, LLC v. [read post]
