Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR" Results 1741 - 1760 of 4,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
Taylor, 401 S.C. 104, 108, 736 S.E.2d 663, 663 (South Carolina Supreme Court 2013).State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 6:43 am by scanner1
CIVIL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT DA 15-0618, 2016 MT 184, PETER ARNONE, DAVE BALDWIN, ROSS HARTMAN, DAWNETTE OSEN, and SHARON SWANSON, Petitioners and Appellants, v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:21 am by Tessa Shepperson
It isn’t a problem any more though because of the case of Spencer v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
First Letter Last Name Division / Judge Floor Courtroom G, 0, S, U    Division A — Greco   2nd   20   B, F, P    Division B — Myers   1st Floor   12   D, M, N, X, Y    Division C — Farr   2nd   24   C, K, R    Division D — Lefler   2nd   23   H, L, W    Division E — Taylor   2nd   22   A, E, J, I, Q, T,… [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:31 am by Taylor Daily
”        Photo credit: Taylor Daily, RegBlog Clinton’s speech pursued themes previously established at the Convention: an optimistic outlook for the United States; empowerment for disadvantaged groups; and an emphasis on the importance of improving democracy. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Employees of a political subdivision of the State may have “layoff rights” as the result of collective bargaining pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law] or a local law, rule or regulation adopted by a political subdivision of the State adopted prior to the effective date of the Taylor Law.Hanson was appointed Mechanical Equipment Operator I [MEO] by the Appointing Authority effective December 24, 2012. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:12 am by Docket Navigator
[W]hile Patent Owner’s argument that the United States 'directed and controlled the allegedly infringing activity' is not without relevance, it does not bear directly on the categories identified by the Supreme Court in [Taylor v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:55 am by Amy Howe
” At Mayer Brown’s Consumer Financial Services Review, Brian Netter analyzes the Court’s decision in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
City of Schenectady v New York State Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), 136 AD3d 1086Leave to appeal granted by Court of Appeals,Issue: Did the Taylor Law, as codified in Civil Service Law Article 14, supersede Article 9 of the Second Class Cities Law thereby making City of Schenectady's police disciplinary procedure a mandatory subject of collective bargaining? [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:23 am by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
Here's the complaint:     The victims and plaintiffs in this case include the families of Yaakov Naftali Fraenkel, a 16-year-old who was kidnapped by Hamas operatives with his friends at a bus stop, shot at point-blank range in the back of the car, and then dumped in a field in Hebron for the police to find nearly three weeks later; Taylor Force, a 29-year-old American MBA student and Army veteran stabbed along a boardwalk in Jaffa; and Chaya Braun, a three-month-old thrown… [read post]