Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
" Lastly, the Alabama Court of Criminal appeals in Michael Shannon Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:35 am
Equal pay for equal work and “red lined” positions Fenton v St. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 7:46 pm
Charles Taylor  International Criminal Court (ICC) Hearing Schedule ICC Newsletter (July 2006) Situations & Cases: Situation in Dafur, Sudan Situation in Central African Republic Situation in Uganda The Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:18 am by Julie Lam
Taylor, No. 143603, be held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Vaughn, No. 142627. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Remittitur The Supreme Court of Arizona rendered an opinion in Soto v, Sacco on July 13, 2017. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The trial court, applying the principles promulgated in Taylor v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:51 pm
There was a lot of discussion around the applicability of Laird v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:13 pm
Canadians should read Martin Taylor's fine introduction to the case has been reproduced by the Scottish Council on Law Reporting. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
” Although a state supreme court justice sustained PERB’s ruling, the Appellate Division reversed, holding that “the broad scope of the Commissioner’s authority to approve cooperative services contracts could not overcome the Taylor Law’s mandate for public sector employment collective bargaining [Matter of Vestal Employees Association, 260 AD2d 699]. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
Judge Taylor grants summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds, and Ramirez appeals to the Ninth Circuit.Judge Brunetti writes the opinion, joined by Judges Kozinski and Rymer. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:46 am
For example, in CSEA v Lakeland Central School District, the Appellate Division rejected the School District’s claim that CSEA’s action for damages “for breach of a collective bargaining agreement” should be dismissed because CSEA had not complied with the “notice of claim” requirements set out in Section 3813(1).The Court said that “the collective bargaining agreement entered into by the parties contained detailed grievance procedures and this… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:47 pm by Matthew Kolken
 See Matter of Robert BAUTISTA, 25 I&N Dec. 616 (BIA 2011).The BIA used the categorical approach set forth in Taylor v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:20 pm by WSLL
Taylor, Student Director, and Callan E. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
” In Taylor, the Court recognized that some statutes had alternative crimes within the same statute. [read post]