Search for: "US v. Shields"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 4,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 12:10 am
Readers may remember Case C-283/01 Shield Mark NV v Joos Kist, trading as Memex, in which it was not Rembrandt who provided the cultural content but Ludwig van Beethoven.Merpel has some bad news for Bas and his colleagues, though: she has spotted some killer prior art, below: [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:54 pm
The case on appeal is In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, which is sometimes called Patel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:45 am
The appeal is dismissed because the officer is not allowed to pursue an appeal like this.The case is Taylor v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:04 am
"As a consequence, the WCAB erred in this case when it ordered an in camera review of the University's allegedly privileged documents by a special master for the purpose of assessing the merits of that privilege claim," the court concluded.The WCAB's order was annulled.The case is Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:32 pm
Showing no faith in the political process, as they exhibited yesterday in King v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:22 pm
In Wendy Murphy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:22 am
Good thing that there are Courts of Appeal (like the 4th Appellate Court) who found in People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 8:27 am
In Scheenstra v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
See also https://nyppl-research.blogspot.com/2018/02/sovereign-immunity-absolute-immunity.html addressing Sovereign Immunity, Absolute Immunity, Qualified Immunity, Use Immunity, Transaction Immunity and Qualified Privilege claims that may be advanced by public officers and employees involved in litigation and, or, administrative hearings. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:07 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:20 am
Ibrahiem KINGS COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawTenant Cannot Use Prior Order Denying Discovery Of Non-Party Wife as Shield; Disclosure Compelled Garzillo v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:26 pm
Apple is or FTC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
See Valeo v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm
Alexander v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:28 am
In Griswold v, Connecticut, the Supreme Court concluded that people have privacy rights that prevent the government from forbidding married couples from using contraception. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:30 am
Funds v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 12:41 pm
Rick cites Davis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:52 am
In James Cable, LLC, v. [read post]
