Search for: "BAKER V. STATE" Results 1761 - 1780 of 3,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane shared the government’s response-and-reply brief in Klayman v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:38 am by Benjamin Bissell
Wells promised that while he could not personally attend a two-day pre-trial hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm by Larry
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
Ostensibly to mark the upcoming launch of the 2014 edition of the Collecting Societies Handbook, jointly published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and Baker & McKenzie [what? [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 1:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That was a 1972 summary decision — that is, without briefs and oral argument — in the Minnesota case of Baker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
For instance, in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
On Friday, Zoe Bedell summarized the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights on extraditions to the United States: Trabelsi v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm by Jason Mazzone
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 577–79 (2003), and United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
 Jack noted the politics at play in the lack of congressional authorization for the use of force against the Islamic State. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
The new decision followed the pattern of the widest-ranging recent decisions against same-sex marriage restrictions: * It ruled that the Supreme Court had not already settled the same-sex marriage issue in a one-line summary decision in 1972 (Baker v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
 In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes focuses on the Court’s 1972 order in Baker v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am by Wells Bennett
Broadly, the government highlights the practical difficulties associated with combating a non-state actor in the twenty-first century. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
First, I think Judge Sutton is most apt to accept the view that the Supreme Court’s 1972 summary refusal to hear an appeal in Baker v. [read post]