Search for: "BARRETT v. STATE"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 1,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Barrett, the writ of coram nobis may not be used to circumvent the clear congressional directive embodied in the 'second of successive' provisions of Section 2255. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
S. 825 and Dolan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:03 pm
Wade and Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 7:21 pm
The Court’s order stated that four justices—Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Barrett—would have granted the application. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
I despise Cooper v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
Robbins in Kisor v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm
Professor Loewy’s article, United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
7 May 2022, 3:51 am
In Cox v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
In fact, the conservative majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 7:13 am
Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington, DC on March 16, 2023. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
There's no indication that he's got any United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
To compensate for those two would require the addition of four new seats—two to cancel out the votes of the current occupants (Justices Gorsuch and Barrett) and two more to substitute for the ones to which Democratic appointees would have been entitled. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
The first instance of the Court’s misfiring came in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
