Search for: "Bar ALE, Inc." Results 1761 - 1780 of 1,980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
I must confess that that may set a new bar for resistance to change.) [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Wolfgang Demino
 Now, Shamoun is getting an opportunity to sway the Texas Supreme Court to gut the statute of frauds applicable to contingent fee contracts by permitting attorneys to recover success-based claims for windfall fees calculated as a percentage of the amount recovered for the client (or saved) which would be barred by the statute in the absence of a written contract signed by the client. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm by Arthur F. Coon
California State Lands Commission (Hanson Marine Operations, Inc., et al., Real Parties In Interest) (1st Dist., Div. 4, 2015) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2015WL 7271956, filed 11/18/15. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In 1982, the Supreme Court again addressed and advanced solicitor-client privilege in Descôteaux et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Banc of America Investment Services, Inc. et al.NJNEWSTeaneck establishing employment discrimination committee? [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:35 pm by Schachtman
Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc., No. 82264-6, Wash. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am by Schachtman
Acuity Products Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S.Ct. 1002 (2012). [read post]