Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2024, 6:05 am
United States has rightly received strong criticism from legal analysts, including me (here, and here, for example). [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 2:37 pm
See Cruz v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am
Special factors did not counsel hesitation, even where a foreign national sought recompense for the misconduct of U.S. officials outside the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:50 pm
United States (especially pp. 26–27 n.5) and its opp. in Franklin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:34 pm
See Blumenthal v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:21 am
The book is a fascinating and disturbing story of jurisprudence related to the issue of standing in citizen challenges to government surveillance in the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of July, two thousand eighteen.PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS,REENA RAGGI,PETER W. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
By Eric SegallFor far too long the United States Supreme Court has unduly interfered in our local, regional, and national politics. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 2:06 pm
The Supreme Court dismissed the role of states in a footnote in Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
Apfelbaum, 445 US 115; People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:20 am
The Senate, to its discredit, seems poised to confirm someone as Attorney General of the United States who is unwilling to give an honest answer to what is in fact the status of waterboarding with regard to torture. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:11 am
Virgina Enterprise Limited Issue: Whether, under 35 U.S.C. 24, a trial judge may subpoena foreign witnesses for deposition in the United States based on their filing of an application with the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:42 pm
Sys. of Mo. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:20 am
With respect to these seventeen petitioners, the Executive Branch has determined not to allow them to enter the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:02 am
Janus v. [read post]
