Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
On two occasions, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
California (1931), Nebbia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
California (1931), Nebbia v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:19 am
FTC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:37 am
It is closely modeled after Section 33.07 of the Texas Penal Code, which came into effect in 2011, and it shares the Texas law's faults. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:37 am
It is closely modeled after Section 33.07 of the Texas Penal Code, which came into effect in 2011, and it shares the Texas law's faults. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:31 am
Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, and Nevada recently joined California and 16 other Democrat state attorneys general in the appeal. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
To get a flavor of this common practice, see the laws of Florida, California, Texas, New York, Michigan, Tennessee, the District of Columbia, or Ohio. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
Court of Appeals in New Orleans (2010-1 Trade Cases ¶76,968), barring price fixing claims against title insurers under the federal “filed rate” doctrine.The home purchasers—alleging a conspiracy to fix the price of title insurance—questioned (1) whether the federal "filed rate" doctrine bars Texas state antitrust and state unfair practices claims where Texas law expressly forbids these practices and (2) whether a federal court of appeals… [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am
Texas, 12-5813, discussed here, seems like an unlikely Boyer substitute: it is a non-capital case from Texas that apparently does not involve delay related to a lack of funding for counsel.) [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:04 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
Texas explicitly makes it a felony to collect ballots “with intent to defraud the voter or the election authority. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Supreme Court, October 14, 2008 Moore v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:13 am
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
University of Texas at Austin also continued yesterday. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 9:45 am
The case of Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 6:28 pm
Apple v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 1:48 pm
California v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:25 am
In the meantime, there would already be a decision from Texas on the FRAND compliance of Ericsson's royalty demands.Alston & Bird again: The lead attorney and first signatory under the new Ericsson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Texas, 06-1616). [read post]
