Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2009, 9:50 am
Thomas Lubanga Dyilo filed a joint application with the Trial Chamber requesting that the Chamber use its authority under Regulation 55 of the Regulations of the Court to apply "an additional legal characterization" to the facts and circumstances described in the charging document, namely by adding the crime against humanity of sexual slavery and the war crimes of sexual slavery and cruel and/or inhuman treatment to the charges.Regulation 55, which is entitled… [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am
See Sohm v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
Schutte v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 10:49 am
(You can read the Court's decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 2:25 pm
State of Arkansas, was the case that was argued orally on Thursday, September 8, 2011, in the Old Supreme Court Chamber at the State Capitol Building. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 12:12 pm
The case is called Lebron v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 12:12 pm
The case is called Lebron v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:32 am
Chambers, 395 F.3d 563, 566 (6th Cir. 2005); United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:57 pm
The Chamber wrote:85. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 6:04 pm
United States, 323 U. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:33 pm
The European Court of Human Rights in Scoppola v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
The court also noted that, according to the arrest report drawn up by the police, the applicant had been among the people who dispersed after the demonstration. # On 27 March 2002, the Principal Public Prosecutor at the Court of Cassation submitted his written opinion to the 9th Chamber of the Court of Cassation, in which he had argued that the Chamber should uphold the judgment of the Izmir State Security Court. # On 10 June 2002 the 9th Chamber of the Court of… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 11:27 am
A concurring opinion published under Marshall's name in Williams v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm
However, Arnold J held that the consent was neither informed nor voluntary: Mr Ali was drowsy, confused and not in a fit state to give consent for the first hour of the programme. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
In Marsh v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:35 pm
Times moves funny in the Kavanaugh chambers. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Pacific Centre for Reproductive Medicine v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 10:38 am
Matthias Zigann noted at a K.Mizra v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 6:50 pm
has a nice discussion of a recent European Court of Human Rights Chamber decision (Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
