Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe" Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Chapter 440 does not cover an accident resulting in injury, which does not arise out of, but does occur in the course and scope of employment. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:27 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
In addition to the Court of Appeals cases above and others, I relied on a recent case from the Third Department, Nudi v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:30 pm by Robert Tanha
I note, however, that Bardal, supra, does not state, nor has it been interpreted to imply, that the factors it enumerated were exhaustive: see e.g.Gillespie v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
To use a credit card please go to the BookLocker at:http://www.booklocker.com/books/3916.html[]===========General Index of Topics Ability to perform light duty - discontinuation of GML §207-c benefitsAdministrative proceduresAge discriminationAgreement to retire.Allowing the arbitrator to exceed authorityApplicants for §207-c benefits -a "direct causal relationshipApplication for an accident disability retirement - tie vote by review boardApplications for accidental… [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Lynch 15-450Issue: Whether a State Department report that does no more in substance than convey double-hearsay statements made by unnamed officials of the foreign government alleged to have persecuted an asylum applicant constitutes “substantial evidence” sufficient to support an agency finding that the applicant should be denied asylum. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 7:27 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
Self-funded plans can also fall victim to the classic insurance coverage dilemma of who is liable when an insured is covered under multiple policies, as was the case in Northeast Department ILGWU v. [read post]