Search for: "Does 1 - 10" Results 1761 - 1780 of 43,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2021, 4:40 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As noted, this is a state-wide error and the state is working to fix it as quickly as possible Now scheduling TESTING for Wednesday January 27th - 10 am to 1 pm. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm by scanner1
FLATHEAD COUNTY, BIGFORK LAND USE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, FLATHEAD COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, FLATHEAD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, FLATHEAD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR JEFF HARRIS and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:59 pm by News Desk
According to the details posted online by the FDA, the recall was initiated on June 1, 2023, and is ongoing. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Service on a trial jury that tried another person for the same or a related offense as the pending charge. 10. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
G 1/05 [11.1] and T 600/08 [2.3]. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:34 pm by Derek T. Muller
It’s easier for the United States Supreme Court to ignore a case that (1) preserves the status quo, (2) affects just one state, and (3) didn’t actually replace an elector. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:54 am
A 72(t) payout does not require Court approval like a structured settlement factoring transaction does. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by LaToya Powell
Restraint of Minors Under 10 – New G.S. 7B-1903(f) prohibits the use of physical restraints to transport a juvenile under the age of 10, who is in secure custody for the purpose of evaluating the juvenile’s need for medical or psychiatric treatment under G.S. 7B-1903(b), if the juvenile does not have a pending delinquency charge, unless “reasonably necessary for the safety of the officer, authorized person, or the juvenile. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
  The Human Resource Executive Online estimates that businesses may qualify for $1 billion or more in refunds if the 6th Circuit opinion is upheld. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:18 am
Take these 10 things to your consultation with a bankruptcy attorney: 1. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
  All rights reserved.House Bill 10-1394, codified at CRS §§ 10-4-110.4 and 13-20-808, significantly affects insurance coverage for construction defect claims. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm by Nico Cordes
Decision G 1/03 therefore does not apply.4.5 The first auxiliary request is thus not allowable, because the subject-matter of claim 1 extends beyond the content of the application as filed, contrary to Article 123(2) EPC.(...)7.2 The board thus concludes that the claims of the third auxiliary request are novel.8. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 12:43 pm by jonathanturley
(a-1) It shall be unlawful for any person or persons to willfully or knowingly use, or allow the use of, the 911 call system to make a false or fictitious report or complaint which initiates a response by District of Columbia emergency personnel or officials when, at the time of the call or transmission, the person knows the report or complaint is false. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 5:05 am by Adriana Burgy
Certainly, incorporation by reference does not trump “specific reference” and may lead to a break in the priority chain for purposes of patentability. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 5:37 am by Rush Nigut
So if you have 10 locations that net $100,000 on average, you now have $1 million in net income and then so on. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:43 pm by William Ozier
In a split 2-1 decision recently issued by the NLRB (Karl Knauz Motors, Inc., 358 NLRB No. 164 (9/28/12)), the Board found that an auto dealership’s maintenance of an employee handbook provision requiring every employee to display “courtesy” toward customers, vendors, suppliers and fellow employees, violated Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”)1. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:12 am by Jon Sands
Leal-Felix, No. 09-50426 (11-1-10) (Goodwin with Rawlison; dissent by Bennett, D.J., N. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 11:07 am
The section 10 clearly contemplates only the award of reasonable fees to the prevailing party. 42 U.S.C. [read post]