Search for: "Friedman v Friedman" Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2016, 7:09 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman LLC represents defendants who seek to appeal convictions from the New Jersey State trial courts to the New Jersey Appellate Division, and from the United States District Court in New Jersey to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am by Frank Cranmer
Unsurprisingly in view of the Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova and Others v Russia [2023] ECHR 55, the Court held (though only by five votes to two) that there has been a violation of Article 8. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:16 pm
However, the complete answer to such suggestion is to be found in the judgment of Rowlatt, J. in Mann v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:08 am by Erin Miller
 Meanwhile, Dan Friedman at Ninth Justice asserts that Republicans are making the confirmation fight more about the president than Kagan. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:15 am
District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Renhcol, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
From early in the twentieth century it has been commonplace to understand that the corporation and its fiduciaries owe their highest duty of loyalty to equity holders, and that this duty requires the operation of the enterprise to maximize the value of their holdings.9 This principle of shareholder primacy continues to serve as the central principal of the legal management of corporate governance.10 From the 1960s, CSR acquired a political dimension as well.11 Milton Friedman famously… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
He turned the project over to Richard Friedman, who didn’t finish it, either. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm by Larry
The Court of International Trade has issued the much anticipated (at least by me) decision on the merits in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]