Search for: "George Washington Law Review"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 3,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2015, 5:23 pm
Those are the questions asked in a recent paper by Pepperdine University Law Professor Robert Anderson IV and George Washington University Law Professor Jeffrey Manns in their paper, “The Delaware Delusion” (here). [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 5:59 pm
Kerr (The George Washington University Law School) has posted An Economic Understanding of Search and Seizure Law (University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
Lorenzo Vidino of the George Washington University. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
The Washington Post discusses the matter here. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 3:15 am
Alejandro Camacho (Irvine) & Robert Glicksman (George Washington) have posted Legal Adaptive Capacity: How Program Goals and Processes Shape Federal Land Adaptation to Climate Change (Colorado Law Review) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:33 pm
Merrill holds a J.D. from George Washington University and a B.A. from Ithaca College. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
Kerr (The George Washington University Law School) has posted Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data (Texas Tech Law Review (Forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 12:30 am
Blanton about his new biography, George I. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
Committed to creating an “American” vision of religious freedom, one that was distinct from the restrictive practices of the individual states, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison created a new template for public religious vocabulary. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:55 am
" That motto is often quoted by law professors, civil rights advocates, and others, and comes from a Sept. 28, 1789, letter from George Washington, who was seeking to convince Edmund Randolph to serve as the first Attorney General. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am
” At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Phyllis Goldfarb cites the “animosity” in some of the Justices’ opinions in the case as evidence that an “adverse impact on the quality of the Court’s functioning is yet more collateral damage from our capital punishment system. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:01 am
His second argument is that four men were central to this transition from a confederation of very independent-minded states to a nation of Americans: namely, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Alan Morrison criticizes what he describes as the lack of substantive response from the dissenting Justices, while at the Human Rights at Home Blog Jonathan Todres argues that a part of the Chief Justice’s dissent “should not be overlooked, as its implications for access to justice are potentially far-reaching. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
” Email the Roundup Team noteworthy law and security-r [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on yesterday’s decision in King comes from Laurence Tribe in The Boston Globe, Linda Greenhouse in The New York Times, Adam Zimmerman at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re at PrawfsBlawg, Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog, Richard Pierce at the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Leland Beck at the Federal Regulations Advisor, Lisa Keen of the Keen News Service, Joan Krause… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:22 am
Editor’s note: Special thanks to Edward J. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
” At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Christy DeSanctis analyzes last week’s decision in Brumfield v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
George, Washington Post] Disgraced politico Monica Conyers sues McDonald’s over cut finger [Detroit News] American Law Institute considers redefining tort of “battery” to protect the “unusually sensitive”, Prof. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Joan Meier discusses Ohio v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
Commentary on the Reed case comes from Hadley Arkes, who at Library of Law and Liberty contends that the decision “revealed the unlovely spectacle of the conservatives talking themselves ever deeper into a genuine moral relativism in the regulation of speech”; from Travis Weber of the Family Research Council Blog, who describes the decision as a “Free Speech victory”; and from Alan Morrison, who discusses the decision at the George Washington… [read post]
