Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
You see a fair number of Ninth Circuit cases certifying questions to the California Supreme Court, the Arizona and Nevada Supreme Courts, etc. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Does that tell you – a light bulb doesn’t go off in your head and say, This is a drug deal? [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:18 am
In Vance v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:08 pm
Knight v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm
California, New York v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 8:21 am
I hope that everyone is adjusting to being back in the swing of things as we head into the new calendar year, and a fresh slate. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
J is for jury awards: Following a four week trial, lasts Wednesday and full of holiday cheer, a Pennsylvania federal jury awarded Carnegie Mellon University $1.17 billion in damages for the infringement of its patents relating to "noise predictive detection" technology by Marvell Technology Group, a Santa Clara, California head-quartered chip manufacturer. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:31 pm
Though I guess you could easily call that a good thing as well.Fortunately the California Supreme Court lets me know. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
I suspect that we will see fireworks in 2013 as the matter heads to trial. 7. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 1:43 pm
Next time you drive over the (beautiful) Golden Gate Bridge, and stare into the traffic that's going the other way -- with drivers perhaps distracted by the wonderful view -- it may be worth knowing that (1) there's an easy way to stop head-on collisions on that bridge, one that's been used with great success on other bridges (including the Coronado Bridge down in San Diego), but (2) even though it's been strongly recommended that California install such a device on the… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:38 am
For example, in September 2012, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a bill barring employers from taking adverse employment actions based on an employee’s religious dress or grooming practice (AB 1964). [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 6:06 pm
Perhaps someone read the Disney v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 10:00 am
(Filbin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
City of Pleasanton v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:19 am
She sued under California state law. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:08 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:29 pm
Ioli Trust v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Equality v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 7:31 am
Willis v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Federal prosecutors on Friday filed a motion to amend their forfeiture complaint in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
