Search for: "In re D. W." Results 1761 - 1780 of 4,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm by Marie Louise
 i4i (Patently BIOtech) Microsoft – Microsoft commences patent infringement proceedings before W D Washington and ITC against Barnes & Noble over Android-based e-reader and tablet devices (ArsTechnica) (ITC Law Blog) (IP Watch) (IPBiz) Microsoft – US DOJ: Invalidating an issued patent should require clear and convincing evidence: Microsoft v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm by thomasgalvani
Mount Baldy hike off Snowbird Ski ResortThe Trademark Office may send you an office action or notice after you’ve filed maintenance paperwork in your trademark registration. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Dies würde den Einsprechenden benachteiligen und wäre auch nicht verfahrensökonomisch. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 11:10 am by Emmanuel Sala
[5] Lettre d’interprétation de Revenu Québec 15-0247450991 « Crédit d’impôt remboursable relatif à des ressources minières, pétrolières, gazières ou autres – Société titulaire d’un claim en vertu de la Loi sur les mines – Autre société étrangère œuvrant dans la prospection et… [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
Pulse Trading, Inc (Docket Report) District Court W D Virginia: Intervening rights absolve of damages for activities before reexamination certificate issue date: University of Virginia Patent Foundation v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Kao, 639 F.3d 1057, 1067 (Fed. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
   The German (Düsseldorf) and Dutch courts found the opposite and concluded that Article 3(c) was not met. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The FTC takes very aggressive positions on what’s potentially deceptive when it’s not at all clear there’d be a real violation of §5. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:07 am by Juan C. Antúnez
If someone tried to challenge these obvious mistakes in court, they’d inevitably lose (see here). [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 9:08 am by Eugene Volokh
For instance, if an issue of res judicata arose, what would stop Doe—or another person claiming to be the true Jane Doe—from bringing a new action related to the same subject matter? [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Karl, 647 S.E.2d 899, 917-18 (W. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Mainville, Claudine Roy et Stephen W. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Specifically, we’re thinking of both innovator prescription drugs and §510k medical devices. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
He added, “[w]e should grant certiorari to discourage this appetite—or maybe just serve green beans. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But a new branch arose, dealing w/largely functional works and reverse engineering. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 We’ve struggled w/ the relevance of consent. [read post]