Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2014, 5:34 pm
(“Alcon”) appeals from the final judgments of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware finding that Barr Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of New York Times v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
Holder, Jr., and James R. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:18 am
Last September, I noted the case of Dunlap v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 11:14 am
The Canadian court held that risk sufficed, and it went further, contrary to the majority of courts in the United States, to hold that a 40% reduction in risk sufficed to satisfy the more-likely-than-not standard. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
United States, 340 U.S. 367, 373 (1951). [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
James Grimmelmann’s twitter feed for a strong reaction and trenchant critique.) [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
Allcare Health Management, two cases involving attorney’s fees in patent cases. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am
Turning to detainee news: Wells reported the much awaited DC panel decision in the Guantanamo force-feeding case, Aamer v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Approximately two years after [Gratton] began using the Van Praagh name in association with her own spiritual medium services, on October 30, 2012, [she] registered the James Van Praagh Trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. . . . [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:32 pm
The policy also establishes detailed procedures for review of a proposed assertion of the state secrets privilege in a particular case. ! [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
There, United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The case is Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:46 am
As Wikipedia notes, “Title III of the Act set rules for obtaining wiretap orders in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:15 am
Obama added a comment perhaps inspired by a case now pending before the justices, McCutcheon v. [read post]
