Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 1761 - 1780 of 21,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
Gulfstream Aerospace sent up one of their $50M business jets today on an 8.5-hour test flight spanning 11 states for the sole purpose of leaving their mark on the Net in the form of a flight track that spells out 'GV' (the nickname of the Gulfstream V aircraft being flown) when viewed online. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Lyle reported on the decisions in Fisher and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm by Marty Lederman
Earlier today, Mark Tushnet posted about Justice Thomas’s recent eye-opening concurrence in the Court’s denial of cert. in McKee v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:29 am by Jani Ihalainen
In the General Court Nestle failed to show use throughout the EU, not just in a substantial part of it, and therefore the mark was invalidated.A Kit Kat KounterfeitPer the decision in August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU set the bar for the acquisition of distinctive character through use as requiring "…evidence… that [the mark] has acquired, through the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:29 am by Jani Ihalainen
In the General Court Nestle failed to show use throughout the EU, not just in a substantial part of it, and therefore the mark was invalidated.A Kit Kat KounterfeitPer the decision in August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU set the bar for the acquisition of distinctive character through use as requiring "…evidence… that [the mark] has acquired, through the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab… [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm by INFORRM
They mark the seriousness of the defamation and are a part of the vindication. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern observes that Dimaya “marked the first time Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg assigned a majority opinion in her nearly 25 years on the high court. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]