Search for: "McDonald v. McDonald" Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  ** Citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, the Appellate Division's decision held the arbitrator was free to consider "parol evidence" concerning a past practice given the ambiguity the arbitrator found in Article 45, §E of the CBA.Click here to access the Appellate Division's ruling. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:38 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
And a second amicus brief focused on Justice Thomas, but on his reliance in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:27 am
The Proceedings In 2006 McDonald's International Property Co. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
In the Supreme Court, hyper-technicalities are most frequently used to defeat the claims of deserving plaintiffs, as in the now-Congressionally-overruled Ledbetter case or even worse, in Bowles v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm by GJEL Staff
Hot Coffee Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
So if you are teaching a constitutional law course and would like to include a 2 or 3 week unit on the Second Amendment, your students could buy chapter 9 (Heller and McDonald) plus chapter 11 (post–Heller cases in the lower courts). [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Additionally, to the extent that the breach of contract claim is alleged and based on the same factual assertions supporting the proposed legal malpractice claim, said cause of action must be dismissed as it is a duplicative claim and/or a claim guised as a breach of contract but is in fact alleging legal malpractice (see Courtney v McDonald, 176 AD3d 645 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:01 am by Guest Blogger
Adam WinklerOne important question raised by McDonald v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:49 am by Lawrence Solum
The incorporation story features analysis of John Paul Stevens’ final passionate dissent after 35 years on the Court, which came in last Term’s blockbuster Second Amendment incorporation case, McDonald v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 3:53 pm by Mike
McDonald is a petition for habeas corpus on both grounds listed above. [read post]