Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 1761 - 1780 of 3,728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2013, 12:39 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
§242 sets out the rights of public officers and employees absent on military duty as members of the organized militia or of reserve forces or reserve components of the armed forces of the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
AdamsCase number: 13-cv-12856 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan)Case filed: July 1, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: July 19, 2013 8/16/2013 11/14/2013 2013-71 SEC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 3:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Marie, have argued in federal court that the Michigan Indian Land Claims Settlement Act of 1997 allows them to buy land anywhere in the United States to build a casino, so long as the land was purchased with land claim settlement trust funds. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Monday, December 2: No. 12-515 — Michigan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:09 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am by Girardeau Spann
This is largely deliberate, reflecting the relatively low priority that incon­venient racial equality is typically accorded by United States culture. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am by Susan Brenner
Hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States, unless one of [a number of] exceptions applies to the particular statement being made. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Troy District Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig has ruled that Michigan's motor vehicle code provision criminalizing the operation of a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance [marijuana] violates the equal protection clause of the Michigan and United States Constitutions.The case, People v Sulaka, arose in 2010 when the accused was allegedly speeding and, when pulled-over, could not produce a drivers license. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am by Michael F. Smith
Given the fundamental question it poses regarding an electorate’s right to amend its own state constitution, Schuette v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am by Richard A. Epstein
  For instance, the dangers that the Equal Protection Clause were intended to address reared their ugly head in the Old South after the disastrous 1876 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Michigan’s current version of its Fair and Open Competition in Governmental Construction Act (FOCGCA), in which the state made an across-the-board determination not to require contractors on public construction projects not to enter project labor agreements (PLAs) was not preempted by the NLRA, ruled a divided Sixth Circuit (Michigan Building and Construction Trades Council v Snyder, September 6, 2013, Rogers, J). [read post]