Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 1761 - 1780 of 3,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, earlier this year, the New York Court of Appeals held in People v Harnett that a guilty plea to a sex offense is not automatically invalidated because the defendant was not warned that he may be subject to SOMTA. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
  And one of the earlier cases that was cited was that of Smith v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 4:52 pm
Id. at 45.As noted by Justice Souter in his dissenting opinion in Kansas v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court in 2003 stated in Smith v Doe that the ex post facto application of these Sex Offender Registration Laws was not Punitive in nature, but civil and regulatory intent. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:51 pm by John Culhane
Earlier today, I live-blogged the argument to a Ninth Circuit panel in Perry v. [read post]