Search for: "Research In Motion Limited"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 3,047
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2013, 11:04 am
In a harshly toned order, Judge Koh rejects Google’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
And critically, the defense of these mechanisms necessarily involves a defense of significant limitations on transparency—just as the defense of the core operations of this committee involves a defense of significant limitations on transparency. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Douglas Woodlock, faced a renewed Rule 702 motion directed to Milward’s specific causation expert witnesses. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:22 am
Section 5 started as a simple, rigid and coherent rule that limited sales efforts after the SEC had declared the registration statement “effective. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:58 pm
So, the district court did not take a de novo look at the original motion and discovery sought. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:35 pm
Cronin gained extensive trial experience in both felony and misdemeanor trials, and engaged in post-verdict appellate issues, grand jury investigations, and motion practice. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:10 am
However, those claims are being challenged, at least in part, by a study released by Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and performed by the research firm Compete (PDF), which examines the role of search engines in directing individuals to pirated content. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm
She only means to limit human error to the greatest extent possible; that’s what is required by the ethics rules. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
That should mean their influence is geographically limited. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:55 am
Or was Twombly really just about limiting discovery in massive anti-trust cases? [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:39 am
If you're a security researcher in the Ninth Circuit (which covers most of the West Coast) who wants to capture unencrypted Wi-Fi packets as part of your research, you better call a lawyer first (and we can help you with that). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:34 am
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 4:47 pm
This court denied the oral motion, with leave to renew in writing. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
A jury awarded over $1.2 million on Groeneveld’s trade dress claims, but the majority found that Lubecore’s Rule 50 motion should’ve been granted. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 4:39 am
Staying in Canada, Blackberry/Research-in-Motion, whose smartphone seemed everywhere only a few years ago, is facing the choice of what assets to sell to whom and whether it can reconstitute itself in a different form (as Nokia claims it will be doing).A major argument made in explaining the rise and fall of such companies is that they were doomed from the outset because of their location. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:26 am
The expert's testimony was limited to the acute phase. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:53 am
There was no dispute that two prior art references disclosed the limitations of the asserted claims, but the parties disputed whether there was sufficient motivation to combine them. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 2:53 pm
The expert's testimony was limited to the acute phase. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:30 pm
The defendants contend that costs should be limited to $650,000. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 3:59 pm
Since the statute of limitations did not begin to run prior to the release, the action would have been timely commenced if it was otherwise proper as to form. [read post]
