Search for: "STATE v. WRIGHT"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,098
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
For that reason, the “determination of a fact-finder as to the value of a business, if it is within the range of testimony presented, will not be disturbed on appeal where the valuation rests primarily on the credibility of the expert witnesses and their valuation techniques” (Matter of Wright v Irish, 156 AD3d 803 [2d Dept 2017]). [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 5:18 pm
Uniloc v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:32 am
Professor Koh argues that the "sole organ" doctrine has taken a drubbing, citing recent Supreme Court rulings.But I am not so sure.For one thing, even if the Supreme Court is eager for Congress to reassert its prerogatives, as Justice Breyer's Hamdan v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:26 pm
H&H Electric, Inc., September 15, 2015, Wright, S.). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:57 am
Hylko v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
In the last installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 8:58 am
In most cases, an appeal is not filed until there is a final judgment in the case, and there is no such final judgment here – Judge Rakoff has consolidated the case with a related matter brought by the Commission, SEC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
As outlined in Ribeiro v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
“Moreover, ‘it matters not whether [the sale] came to pass because of an intentional or voluntary act of the testator’” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *5 [quoting Matter of Wright, 7 NY2d 365, 367 [1960]). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:57 am
Hylko v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
At the BC Employment Lawyer Blog, Daniel Sorensen of Waterstone Law Group wrote about the ramifications of a recent human rights tribunal decision, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
RECO Equip., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
“Moreover, ‘it matters not whether [the sale] came to pass because of an intentional or voluntary act of the testator’” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *5 [quoting Matter of Wright, 7 NY2d 365, 367 [1960]). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
Wright National Flood Ins. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm
The case in question, Wright v. [read post]
