Search for: "Springs v. United States" Results 1761 - 1780 of 1,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 4:56 pm by Rick
As I’ve noted more than once previously (yes, I’m going to quote myself), pre-Nazi Germany wasn’t all that different from the United States today: As alluded to above, even Nazi Germany didn’t spring fully-armored from the brow of Zeus. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm by Chuck Cosson
  The ‘Arab Spring,’ gave considerable credit (perhaps excessive credit) to the affordances offered by online tools. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
It states that DHS “may return” a person “who arrives by land from a foreign territory contiguous to the United States” to that territory pending an immigration hearing. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am by Jonathan Shaub
Stephen Bannon has defied the Jan. 6 Committee’s subpoena for documents and testimony. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Olga Butkevych
Therefore, the existence of national minorities and their rights spring not from a state legislature, but from the facts of the lives of the peoples at issue. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
” Here in the United States, though, high-school chemistry is treated by some courts as junk science. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
Nearly Legal on No admittance : Sharon Horie v the United Kingdom – 31845/10 [2011] ECHR 289. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:18 pm by centerforartlaw
Landmark Copyright case: Thaler v Perlmutter[3] (For an in-depth case review of Thaler v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19]             Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
  Surely, it will be argued, the United States is TRIPS-compliant as the leading proponent and creator of the TRIPS; hence, if eBay is the law of the United States, it presents a model of TRIPS-compliance for any country to follow. [read post]