Search for: "Stanford Law Review" Results 1761 - 1780 of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm by Ms. JD Weekly Roundup
In law professor news, the most cited law reviews of all time were published in Michigan Law Review. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
Call for Papers: Women & International Criminal Law Special Issue of the International Criminal Law Review Dedicated to Judge Patricia M. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:16 am
University of Pennsylvania; J.D., George Washington University National Law Center.Quinn, T. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:56 am
University of Pennsylvania; J.D., George Washington University National Law Center.Quinn, T. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Cambridge analytica, data misuse, and platform responsibility, Room 280B, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, CA, Thursday 24 May 2018, 12:50pm – 2:00pm. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Mark Lemley wrote in the Stanford Law Review that Gary Boone invented the integrated circuit, and no one at Stanford checked the statement for accuracy. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:45 am by Gene Takagi
Stanford Social Innovation Review: Risk management is an emerging #nonprofit best practice, says @TBilich, but what strategies work? [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:11 am by Steve Vladeck
Nominations will be reviewed by a prize committee comprised of Professors Janet Cooper Alexander (Stanford), Judith Resnik (Yale), and me, with the result announced at the Federal Courts section program at the 2014 AALS Annual Meeting. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:14 am by Rantanen
  In a recent online essay published by the Stanford Law Review, Lee Petherbridge and I draw attention to a benefit the best mode requirement provides (or perhaps "provided" is more accurate) that directly challenges the conventional attitude toward best mode, arguing that best mode works closely with the nonobviousness requirement to establish the level of "inventiveness" that the U.S. patent system has long considered optimal. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 6:52 am by Jordan Furlong
(Great review here.) [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Some recent publications include: * Patent Damages and the Shape of Patent Law, 89 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW __ (2009) (forthcoming) * Patents, Essential Medicines, and the Innovation Game, 58 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW 501 (2005) * Deconstructing Jefferson's Candle: Towards a Critical Realist Approach to Cultural Environmentalism and Information Policy, 49 JURIMETRICS ___ (2009) (forthcoming) * Peer-to-Peer Networks, Technological Darwinism, and… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IPRoo), Review of National Innovation System – Key points for corporate counsel: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Review of National Innovation System recommends creative commons: (creativecommons.org), Review of Innovation System released: (IP Menu News), What [right]’s in a [business] name: Westpac Banking Corporation v McMillan & Melbas On The Park Pty Ltd (formerly Credit Systems Australia Pty Ltd): (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog),… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:59 am by Daniel Solove
Omer is also an Affiliate Scholar at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society; a Senior Fellow at the Future of Privacy Forum; and a member of the Editorial Board of International Data Privacy Law (Oxford University Press). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm by Harold O'Grady
Cheating Ethics and Law in Everyday Life by Stanford Law School Professor Deborah L. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 4:47 pm
Solove, “Fourth Amendment Pragmatism,” __ Boston College Law Review __ (2010) (forthcoming); Jed Rubenfeld, “The End of Privacy,” 61 Stanford Law Review 101 (2008); Timothy P. [read post]
23 May 2008, 8:50 am
"Yesterday, Akin Gump and the Stanford Clinic filed this reply brief in the case of Cone v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 8:55 am by Walter Olson
Three pending federal bills “call for increasing CPS [Child Protective Services] investigations of minor marks on children… The proposed bills should raise special concerns for families of children with rare medical conditions and disabilities” [Diane Redleaf] Argument: negotiations for kinship care in the shadow of threatened CPS proceedings amount to a parallel, hidden foster care system [Josh Gupta-Kagan, Stanford Law Review via Diane Redleaf]… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:15 am
  Tiffany Cartwright, a 3L at Stanford Law School, provided an early discussion of the case last week on SCOTUSblog. [read post]