Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
” The forum selection bylaw at issue in City of Providence was “virtually identical” to the bylaw adopted in Boilermakers with the exception that, unlike the bylaws in Boilermakers, which designated Delaware as the exclusive forum, the bylaw designated “as the forum the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, or, if that court lacks jurisdiction, any North Carolina state court with… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
KellerDocket: 10-804Issue(s): (1) Whether the Supreme Court of North Carolina correctly held that the Due Process Clause permitted the state to continue to incarcerate prisoners even though they had been awarded sufficient sentence-reduction credits to mandate release; and (2) whether the Supreme Court of North Carolina correctly held that the Ex Post Facto Clause permitted the state to refuse to honor the sentence-reduction credits awarded to… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
North Carolina, which asks whether a ban on social media use by sex offenders violates the First Amendment, noting that the court “keeps on accepting First Amendment cases,” which “does not bode well for state and local governments, like North Carolina in this case. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
” And again, “there is no proof that it is any kind of serious problem in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
The North Carolina Legislature becomes the 38th state to ratify the 26th Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am
Empirical Evidence from a National Experiment and Normative Concerns in the Case of Same-Sex Marriage, (93 North Carolina Law Review, 2014, Forthcoming).Cary Franklin, Discriminatory Animus, (A Nation of Widening Opportunities? [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:09 am
According to the United States Supreme Court: Kalina's certification contained two inaccurate factual statements. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
The parties to the lawsuit had sold a database, which collected police reports from across the United States, to LexisNexis. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm
North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 305 (1976)). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:00 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment that it owed no duty to defend or indemnify and that the policies were properly rescinded. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Schwalm, Emancipation's Diaspora: Race and Reconstruction in the Upper Midwest (University of North Carolina Press, 2009). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The record of medical boards and professional societies’ efforts to curb abusive medico-legal testimony is uneven.[1] In one closely followed case, the North Carolina Medical Board revoked a physician’s license on the basis of finding of “unprofessional conduct” in the form of testimony given in a medical malpractice case. [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:58 pm
The court relied on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Heien v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm
Hamilton (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a Kansas criminal defamation statute as facially valid after interpreting it to require actual malice); see generally United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:02 pm
It has is involved in challenges against Iowa and North Carolina Ag-Gag laws. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Id. at *10-11.Third, to supply the otherwise missing element of “foreseeability,” Block – relying on Minnesota, rather than North Carolina law – invented a purported “duty to test” never before seen in North Carolina, see Couick v. [read post]
