Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:39 pm
United States, according to Bloomberg News. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
Supreme Court decision, United Automobile Workers v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:06 pm
United States (10-5258) was all about the rule. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Carolina Foam Industries, Inc., 935 P.2d 876, 883, (Ariz. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:29 pm
And, of course, given the vagaries (actually a euphemism for "indefensible features") of the American political system, where political hacks are in charge of the election process, it remains conceivable, e.g., that Trump will win North Carolina, Wisconsin, or even Ohio because of the blatantly partisan voter suppression presided over by rabidly Republican secretaries of state or other election officials. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
KellerDocket: 10-804Issue(s): (1) Whether the Supreme Court of North Carolina correctly held that the Due Process Clause permitted the state to continue to incarcerate prisoners even though they had been awarded sufficient sentence-reduction credits to mandate release; and (2) whether the Supreme Court of North Carolina correctly held that the Ex Post Facto Clause permitted the state to refuse to honor the sentence-reduction credits awarded to… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:57 am
United States (No. 10-5258) in the latter category. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:41 pm
United States (No. 10-5258) in the latter category. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
” The forum selection bylaw at issue in City of Providence was “virtually identical” to the bylaw adopted in Boilermakers with the exception that, unlike the bylaws in Boilermakers, which designated Delaware as the exclusive forum, the bylaw designated “as the forum the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, or, if that court lacks jurisdiction, any North Carolina state court with… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
North Carolina, which asks whether a ban on social media use by sex offenders violates the First Amendment, noting that the court “keeps on accepting First Amendment cases,” which “does not bode well for state and local governments, like North Carolina in this case. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
The North Carolina Legislature becomes the 38th state to ratify the 26th Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Ligon, who practice in the North Carolina firm of Teague Campbell Dennis & Gorham, offer important insights for those handling workplace violence claims in the Carolinas in their article entitled, “Navigating Workplace Violence Claims Under the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act,” found in § 4. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:09 am
According to the United States Supreme Court: Kalina's certification contained two inaccurate factual statements. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
” And again, “there is no proof that it is any kind of serious problem in the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:00 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment that it owed no duty to defend or indemnify and that the policies were properly rescinded. [read post]
