Search for: "State v. Baker"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 6:53 am
This reluctance stems from separation of power and comity concepts, plus the need for finality and certainty regarding the status of a statute, Baker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 1:51 pm
That was a 1972 summary decision — that is, without briefs and oral argument — in the Minnesota case of Baker v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
Chief Judge Baker's opinion begins:Appellant-third-party-plaintiff Charles W. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:26 am
In Lorenzo v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:07 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:15 pm
V. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:36 pm
Stein, 347 U.S. 201, 217-18 (1954) (citing Baker v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:17 am
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:37 pm
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Michael Baker v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:14 pm
Appearances For the appellant: Bruce McClintock SC and Richard Potter instructed by Baker & McKenzie. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Baker, 554 U. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:23 am
She cited Crawford v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) John Rolston v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
”Bob” DeSousa, State Director for U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:08 pm
As for others – such as religiously scrupled bakers and florists – absent (much-needed) legislation, the state action doctrine permits them the freedom to discriminate against same-sex couples. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:43 am
The Court established the modern doctrinal test in Baker v. [read post]