Search for: "State v. Country" Results 1761 - 1780 of 26,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:59 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
Under that provision, the Appellant is deemed not to have entered this country. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 11:23 am by skelly
  The Court also noted that “the weight of [state supreme court] authority from across the country” favors pro rata allocation. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 7:32 am
The closest the country has come to the prosecution of a former president over official actions came in 1974, when Richard M. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 12:00 am by Raymond G. Lahoud
Once again, immigration policy finds itself in the spotlight, as the United States Supreme Court recently heard oral argument for United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 30 January  2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm by Orin Kerr
This issue is being litigated all over the country right now thanks to a clash of two recent Fourth Amendment cases, Herring v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 12:56 pm
Then, in 2003, Mexico sued the United States in the International Court of Justice in The Hague on behalf of Medellin and 50 other Mexicans on death row in the U.S. who also had been denied access to their country's diplomats following their arrests. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:15 am by ASAD KHAN
The Convention, similar to many multilateral treaties, was framed to apply only to a state’s “home country” or “metropolitan territory” unless extended to other territories under art 40 which suggests that a state’s metropolitan territory and dependent territories need to be treated as separate units. [read post]