Search for: "United States v. Marks" Results 1761 - 1780 of 9,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
United States, concerns the "safety valve" provision in federal criminal sentencing laws. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:00 am by Aren Sharifi
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the third party derivative suit pursuant to Fed. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:49 am by Christine Corcos
The Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution enshrines Congress’s “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
The Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution enshrines Congress’s “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
Hashtag as a trademarkThe United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in § 1202.18 of The Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) provides  that a mark consisting of variants of the term HASHTAG or the hash symbol mayfunction as a mark only when such mark “functions as an identifier of the source of the applicant’s goods or services”. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that an individual who surrenders his guns to police and is then convicted of a felony has the right to transfer those guns to an independent third party, including by selling them. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:     In 1934, in the midst of the Depression, the United States Supreme Court, in Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 12:27 am
Also, GAC had had registrations for "BIOFORCE" and "SENTALLOY" in the United States whereas the Proprietor did not have any registration for the said marks anywhere in the world. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:51 am
Solicitor General, the Court welcomes you to the performance of the important office that you have assumed, to represent the Government of the United States before this Court. [read post]