Search for: "#edwards, in Re" Results 161 - 180 of 4,545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
This bibliography comprises scholarly books, book chapters, and journal articles published or accepted for publication by full-time, emeritus, and retired faculty of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law between April 1, 2023 and June 30, 2023. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by ilyabeylin
Swaps, like other derivatives, are instruments for (re-)allocating risk. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
This case was remitted for re-hearing on that issue. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am by INFORRM
David Miranda was stopped by the police at Heathrow Airport and questioned about items in his possession, including hard drives with encrypted data from the National Security Agency (NSA) acquired by Edward Snowden. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:50 pm by Cindy Cohn
“They’re the ones whose blame is to be feared. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Re St Margaret, Rottingdean (No 2) [2021] ECC Chi 1 in which a faculty was granted for the the re-carving of two headstones which used offensive language concerning two music hall artistes. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Swift J found that a new appeal would simple re-run arguments which had already been made. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Haofei Liu
Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards indicated that he will veto the bill. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 3:05 am by Chris Seaton
And all of this could’ve been avoided if the researchers just asked the boys, “Is what you’re doing magic? [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by Dan Bressler
” “In the first case, Walker said, ‘What’s in the record, for example — is there anything in the record that says we are now going to take away Disney’s special status because they’re woke? [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:23 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Therefore, X et al. should be prevented from bringing a new action, the purpose of which was the re-examination of what had already been decided (DSC, Appeal No. 419/2023 of 17 May 2023). [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:45 am by Unknown
Because it means they will have to return—and not by choice (MENASource, May 2023) [text]"UN marks 75 years since displacement of 700,000 Palestinians," UN News, 15 May 2023 [text]Reports & journal articles:"The Effect of Housing Environments on Mental Well-Being and the Impact of War Among Syrian Refugees in Jordan: Comparison between In-Camp and Urban Populations," The Lancet, 16 May 2023 [preprint]"Lebanese migration policy since 2011 and its role in the Syrian… [read post]