Search for: "*u. S. v. Quick"
Results 161 - 180
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
According to a quick Lexis search, this is the first time it has been used in a judicial opinion. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel: I'm going to give you until 6pm to come up with a better response nadia.Nadia: OR WHAT AKHILPatel: Hahha look how quick u respond when you FEEL like ur gonna get hurt ... do you care about huring me hahahha NOPE.! [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStockSection 230 * Backpage.com, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
’s handgun ban would fail ‘[u]nder any of the standards of scrutiny.'” So the 2nd Circuit proceeded to Step 2 of Marzzarella: apply some form of heightened scrutiny. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:00 am
” The Government also argued that the Seventh Circuit’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 2:16 am
In People v. [read post]
Beecher-Monas Proposes to Abandon Common Sense, Science, and Expert Witnesses for Specific Causation
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm
It is not all about putting a DSM-V diagnosis on the chart, and prescribing medication. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
First, a quick summary of the change in pleading standards. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
First, a quick note on the government's new final rules regarding the religious accommodation (including its extension to some for-profit employers such as Hobby Lobby, Inc.). [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:02 am
The officer continued driving past the store, made a U-turn, and came back. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
S. 558 (2003) and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Baker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am
The Supreme Court, taking quick action on two states’ constitutional challenge to Colorado’s new marijuana sales policy, asked the federal government on Monday for its reaction to that case (144 Original, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Moreover, a contractual provision setting a deadline will generally be more amenable to quick and efficient application and enforcement because it is likely unambiguous and the relevant facts are measured in days or months. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Moreover, a contractual provision setting a deadline will generally be more amenable to quick and efficient application and enforcement because it is likely unambiguous and the relevant facts are measured in days or months. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
“[U]ncertainty concerning future events should not bar attempts to assign value to an asset” (Burns v Burns, 84 NY2d 369, 375 [1974]). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 11:44 am
One last thing: this quick primer is intended to apply to withholding on wages and doesn’t take into account special circumstances. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
Then things got graphic, owing to the government’s next exhibit. [read post]
