Search for: "*washington v. State of Fla"
Results 161 - 180
of 320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Fla. 2007), involving claims made under Florida and Massachusetts consumer protection statutes. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
We know from Guenther v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
In addition to today’s hearing, the advisory committee will convene three public hearings in early 2014 in Phoenix, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and Anchorage, Alaska, focusing on violence in homes, schools and communities in Indian country. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:42 am
Estate of Jackson, 110 So. 3d 6, Fla. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
”12 Over a century ago, the Supreme Court of Washington noted that “property . . . consists not in tangible things themselves, but in certain rights in and appurtenant to those things,” and “it follows that when a person is deprived of any of those rights he is to that extent deprived of his property. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 12:24 pm
Fla. 2010). [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:35 am
In a controversial 4-3 decision, the Florida Supreme Court in Washington National Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
” Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Fla., Oct. 29, 1998) Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 4:45 am
State, 45 So. 3d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), in which the en banc court divided 6 to 4, with a concurrence and a dissent, in a developing area of the law (Crawford v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 3:30 am
Fla. 2007) (same) (citing Bankers); 1550 Brickell Assocs. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Azzariti, 573 So.2d 173, 173 (Fla. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:54 pm
Garre of the Washington office of Latham & Watkins will argue for the state of Florida in both cases – Florida v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
