Search for: "2012 B PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC"
Results 161 - 180
of 312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
You might think that our next intellectual property (IP) case, Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
In the following guest post from John Reed Stark, President, John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, and David R. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 2:59 pm
The 2011-2012 policy ran from May 19, 2011 to May 19, 2012. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
§ 1369(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
The document added to the previous WikiLeaks publications of the chapters for Intellectual Property Rights (November 2013) and the Environment (January 2014). [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Throughout 2015, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever-changing area of law. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am
Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, 686 F.3d 382 (7th Cir. 2012). [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am
Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, 686 F.3d 382 (7th Cir. 2012). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
This week's case under review is Modern Holdings, LLC et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
California Air Resources Board (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 681 [holding CARB’s board prematurely approved Low Carbon Fuel Standards]; Neighbors For Fair Planning v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
Schumer in 2012 introduced the Innovative Design Protection Act which would extend intellectual property protections to “never-before-seen” fashion designs. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:40 pm
Taking a problem-solution approach to define what is “new and useful” is precisely the type of analysis that Judge Chen applied in DDR Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281, 291.) [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
To accurately reflect the case law, a subdivision should be added recognizing that a lead agency need not “formally adopt” thresholds of significance (as contemplated by § 15064.7(b)), but may also adopt and employ project-specific thresholds of significance (i.e., on a project-by-project basis), so long as they are supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
Nkansah, 699 F.3d 743 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding intent to harm is necessary); United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:52 am
Ct.544 (2012). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 404-405 (1989), and holding a St. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:01 pm
SUNSHINE ENTERPRISES LLC, Appellants, v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
ECDG S, LLC, 220 N.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
” The LLC’s “business and purpose” is broadly defined in Section 2.3, to acquire, own, hold, expand, renovate, lease, manage, sell, operate the real property located at 10 Sheridan Square, New York, New York (the “Premises”) and such other business activities and operations that are reasonably related thereto, subject to the conditions hereinafter contained. [read post]
