Search for: "A CHOICE FOR WOMEN V. AGENCY FOR HEALTH" Results 161 - 180 of 203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In that action, three hospitals affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan, an HMO, have appealed a ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that, although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors (UPMC Braddock v Harris, March 30, 2013, (96 EPD ¶44,801)). [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Agency for International Development v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Lisa Salazar
” The physicians therefore conclude that a decision in K-V’s favor will impose upon doctors “a ‘Sophie’s Choice. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am by Schachtman
However, if we recognize that 5% is not a magic line, then the choice between one tail and two is less important—as long as the choice and its effect on the p-value are made explicit. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Regardless, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to strict scrutiny because required “sexually explicit” labels on video games had been struck down by the Seventh Circuit, and Brown v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Having turned away from a government-run option, Congress contemplated how to do three things and still preserve the private health insurance industry: (1) achieve near-universal health insurance by devising ways to arrange coverage for some 50 million who don’t have it now; (2) take away the insurance companies’ choice not to cover some people who are ill, have been ill, or are prone to be; and (3) get all of this done at “affordable”… [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Blogspot
Sentence of death shall not be imposed for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age and shall not be carried out on pregnant women. [read post]