Search for: "Allen v. Cooper" Results 161 - 180 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in Allen v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Robert Half International: “California Supreme Court to decide how class action lawyers should be paid” [Alison Frankel back in December, and recent coverage: Perry Cooper, BNA/Class Action Litigation Report, Lawrence Schonbrun/Investor’s Business Daily, David Levine and Scott Dodson/SCOCABlog] “New commercial highlights ‘rampant venue shopping’ in Louisiana” [Chamber-backed Louisiana Record] Because stepping up incentives for bounty-hunting… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Carolyn Wright
The question is currently before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Allen v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern worries that Justice Anthony Kennedy’s decision to join the dissenting opinion in Monday’s racial-gerrymandering decision, Cooper v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At Justia’s Verdict blog (via How Appealing), Michael Dorf maintains that analysis of last week’s opinion in Allen v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Public.Resource Org) and government infringement of copyrighted works (Allen v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:28 am
Jeffrey Cooper, No. 95,633 (Clay)Direct appeal (petition for review); ManufactureRandall L. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
Balco a thinly veiled front for U.S. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Allen); City of Charleston v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in Allen v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:10 am
Allen (08-9156), with the grant limited to the first two questions. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
" The Appellate Division held that a default is not willful when it arises from financial disability or from "a sincere, though mistaken, belief that payments were not required, especially when that belief was based upon advice from counsel" (Parnes v Parnes, 41 AD3d 934, 937 [2007]; see Desautels v Desautels, 80 AD3d 926, 930 [2011]; see also Allen v Allen, 83 AD2d 708, 709 [1981]). [read post]