Search for: "Andrews v. Peters"
Results 161 - 180
of 665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2024, 3:30 am
a) Rian Kalden b) Peter Blok c) Patricia Rombach d) Klaus Grabinski 10. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Practical Guide to Successful Intellectual Property Valuation and Transactions by Alexander Puutio€ 135 Internet Law: A Concise Guide to Regulation… [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
”Ananda V. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S, a decision where the CJEU addressed the trade mark absolute grounds of “substantial value” and “shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves”. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:27 pm
- New York lawyer Peter A. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
” At PatentlyO, Dennis Crouch comments on Peter v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
In Astrue v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:00 am
Introduction On 19 June 2024, The Hague Local Division handed down a judgment in a dispute brought by Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Bush v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 6:07 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions by Jonathan P. [read post]
Slants win Trademark Rights Suit On First Amendment Grounds Despite Using Racial Slur as a Trademark
13 Aug 2017, 2:37 pm
Supreme Court had given its ruling on Matal v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Volume I, Dynamic jurisprudential thought / Charles Mwalimu.Mwalimu, Charles.New York : Peter Lang, c2010.AntitrustKF1649.A2 C49 2009Circuit conflicts in antitrust litigation / John H. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Peter Krouse of The Plain Dealer reports on a talk by Jonathan Adler in which he discussed the same-sex marriage cases and the challenge to race-based affirmative action in public universities in Fisher v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:00 am
In this guest post, the Revd Professor Andrew Atherstone, a member of the General Synod’s House of Clergy, reviews the origins of Canon B17 and summarises the Convocation debates of the 1940s and 1950s which led to its current framing’; he concludes by proposing that Synod should look again at this question for the changed world of the 2020s. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:35 am
Ortovox v Mammut The UPC also considered the role of protective letters in Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH (“Ortovox v Mammut”). [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
New IP SilksThe IPKat sent its congratulations to the two newly-minted QCs with appropriately silky IP skills: Andrew Norris (Hogarth Chambers) and James Segan (Blackstone Chambers)! [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
Wold, Peter B. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
His analysis of the result in LAC Minerals Ltd. v. [read post]
