Search for: "Apple v. Apple" Results 161 - 180 of 6,980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 2:49 am by tracey
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc: [2012] EWCA Civ 729;   [2012] WLR (D)  166 “Where the proprietor of a registered Community design, the validity of which was already in issue in proceedings before the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) or another Community design court, brought a counterclaim alleging infringement of the design against a claimant who had issued a claim in a Community design court seeking a… [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
On December 21, 2007, the Recorder reported on a settlement in the Apple v. bloggers case (O'Grady v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:45 pm by Joe Mullin
After delivering a speedy $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung on Friday, the nine Apple v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:45 pm by tekEditor
After delivering a speedy $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung on Friday, the nine Apple v. [read post]
Crabb of the Western District of Wisconsin has granted Motorola Mobility Inc. partial summary judgment on antitrust counterclaims that Apple Inc. has been asserting against Motorola in the patent infringement case of Apple Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 11:15 am by Nicole Page
Apparently, Apple Inc. believes an image of a pear used in connection with a meal preparation app is too close for comfort and that it is entitled to prevent its use. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:26 am by Florian Mueller
Apple says in today's submission that Apple I and Apple II "cannot be reconciled with eBay Inc. v. [read post]
The judgment is also interesting because it is the first time the court has really focused on the question of interest on past licensing fees (interest on past licensing fees is in issue in InterDigital v Lenovo, but the question of whether it is payable and in what amount was adjourned to a later hearing). [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:59 am
As the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation ("WARF") patent infringement case against Apple approached trial, Apple attempted to call a witness live that it had previously informed WARF's counsel would be called by deposition. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:48 am by Florian Mueller
Apple asked the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) presiding over the ITC trial that will start tomorrow (in Washington, D.C.) to preclude Ericsson from referencing other Apple cases, such as Epic Games v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
On April 24, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]