Search for: "Asbestos Corporation Limited" Results 161 - 180 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2015, 7:25 pm by Robert Kreisman
Wagner, 274 Ill.App.3d 511 (1975), where the court limited damages to the money plaintiff would have received from the corporation, i.e., the earnings or wages lost. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 8:39 am by Dean Freeman
The court noted that numerous other state supreme courts had ruled that similar corporate survival statutes were not, in fact, statutes of limitation. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 11:07 am by Sharifi Firm, PLC
  In this case, Lario Melendrez worked for 24 years for Ameron International Corporation (Ameron), where he was exposed to asbestos. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 10:43 am by Michael S. Levine and Paul T. Moura
The court’s holding, and its adoption of Insurance Code Section 520’s limitations on anti-assignment clauses, is also more consistent with the economic realities of both insurance and corporate transactions. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:21 am by Joe Consumer
Georgia's Asbestos Claims Priorities Act severely limits who can file asbestos claims against corporations in the state. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Aspect Contracts (Asbestos) Ltd v Higgins Construction Plc, heard 14-15 April 2015. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 7:32 am by Joe Consumer
”  And the problem is not limited to KBR. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am by Schachtman
The trial court discussed the limitations on animal studies, especially the absence of a compelling animal model of human irritable bowel syndrome. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
[W]e note some tension between [Bauman’s] “at home” requirement and New York’s “doing business” test for corporate “presence,” which subjects a corporation to general jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 10:10 pm by Jon Gelman
Instead, asbestos corporations and the U.S Chamber of Commerce have orchestrated a calculated campaign to delay and deny justice for dying asbestos victims. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 9:57 am by HRWatchdog
Limiting Liability for Commercial Property Owners: the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:54 am by Joe Consumer
  Beyond that, we don’t know what to expect, except we know one thing for sure: there’s no limit to the imagination of corporate miscreants when it comes to finding new ways to immunize themselves from civil and criminal wrongdoing. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
”  For that reason, “[p]unitive awards in asbestos cases usually do not punish the individuals who were responsible for the offensive conduct,” but instead “inflict harm on current shareholders, customers, and employees” of the defendant corporation. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Frank testifies fairly extensively for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., 1986 WL 69060, at *5-6 (N.D. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:06 pm by Ralph Behr, Esq
It started like this: Halliburton, a major petroleum services company, made some very powerful statements about asbestos claims that had been filed against it’s companies by people who were injured by asbestos poisoning. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:47 am by Jon Gelman
Corporate scapegoats do not solve the underlying issue of corporate fraud. [read post]