Search for: "Barnes v. Short"
Results 161 - 180
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2012, 3:44 pm
(I'm sure they have some reason for doing so; maybe Barnes v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
City of Newport Beach, 730 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2013) Barnes v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Pennsylvania and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:22 am
., v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
In Douglas v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 2:40 am
Updates to Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker (2024) (9 new Megas in August), Subchapter V Decision Tracker , Law Firm Rates Tracker (Debtor Professionals Mega Bankruptcies) , Debtor Professionals Mega Tracker , and DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker . [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
Barnes, 14-395, is close behind with five relists. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
Eugene Volokh continues his “short essay” on Snyder v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
In West v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:34 am
Klinger v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:36 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> In Defense of Animals v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am
("[H]urt feelings differ from legal injury"); Barnes-Wallace v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:57 pm
The Wednesday ruling in Barnes v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
The government took issue with suggestions that the consent decree was either too “regulatory” in nature and therefore overbroad or too vague so that it was unenforceable.The Justice Department concluded that both opposing and supporting comments had at least one element in common: they agreed that entry of the decree likely will reduce retail prices for e-books, at least in the short term.The consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:05 am
Barnes Co., 41 Cal. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
" (Mossoff, at 5) (quoting NGS American, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:58 pm
The 230 shield has been interpreted quite broadly, though Roommates.com and Barnes v. [read post]
