Search for: "Barrett" Results 161 - 180 of 6,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
  I’m convinced that Justice Barrett’s concurrence in the Colorado Ballot Access case, Trump v. [read post]
However, Barrett also considered the effect of blocking a user on Facebook, which prevents them from commenting on any of a page’s posts. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am by Dennis Crouch
In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Barrett, the Supreme Court created a two step test, holding that that a public official’s social media conduct only qualifies as state action under §1983 if the official: possessed actual authority to speak on the State’s behalf on the particular matter at issue, and purported to exercise that authority when speaking in the relevant social media posts. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:42 am by Amy Howe
In a unanimous decision on Friday by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the justices sent Freed’s case back for another look. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
United States Supreme Court Justices Barrett and Sotomayor are joining forces to promote civility. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 2:05 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Western University's Acting Ombudsperson, Whitney Barrett, says her caseload declined 15.8% in the most recent academic year. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Barrett was trying to explain why the Court should avoid politics and turn down the temperature on these sorts of election issues. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:17 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Barrett, Sotomayor Emphasize Harmony on Heels of Public Chiding (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law) New Federal Judiciary Rule Will Limit ‘Forum Shopping’ by Plaintiffs (Mattathias Schwartz, The New York Times) Abused teen in Snap case asks US Supreme Court to revisit internet publisher immunity (Alison Frankel, Reuters) The Potential for Chaos in the Wake of the Supreme Court’s Colorado Ballot Decision (Gerard N. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:33 pm by David Oscar Markus
   Justices Sotomayor and Barrett discuss relationships on the Court (also via the NYT):A week after Justice Amy Coney Barrett chastised Justice Sonia Sotomayor for choosing “to amplify disagreement with stridency” in a Supreme Court decision on former President Donald J. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:57 pm by Howard Bashman
” And Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson of Bloomberg Law reports that “Barrett, Sotomayor Emphasize Harmony on Heels of Public Chiding; Justices tout collegiality at embattled Supreme Court; Barrett earlier took issue with tone of liberal concurrence. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Officers descended upon the surrounding neighborhoods and found the vehicle with the child unharmed near Barrett Avenue and Hayes Street. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:03 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Within 20 minutes, officers located the stolen vehicle and the child in the area of Barrett Avenue and Hayes Street. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Justice Amy Comey Barrett registered that same anxiety in her concurring opinion. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:51 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  The per curiam opinion concluded that federal legislation is necessary to enforce Section 3's Disqualification Clause, yet even Barrett's concern-trolling concurrence argued that it was unnecessary to reach "the complicated question whether federal legislation is the exclusive vehicle through which Section 3 can be enforced," because the Court could have saved Trump's hide simply by ruling that Colorado could not disqualify him. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
Justice Barrett wrote separately to explain she only agreed with part of the majority per curiam opinion. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
Justice Barrett wrote separately to explain she only agreed with part of the majority per curiam opinion. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:20 am by David Super
  Justice Barrett joined this part of the Court’s opinion, and the disaffected liberal justices wrote that allowing states to enforce Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment “would, we agree, create a chaotic state-by-state patchwork, at odds with our Nation’s federalism principles. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am by Eric Segall
On Monday, the Supreme Court surprised only the most optimistic of folks and reversed the Colorado Supreme Court's decision disqualifying Donald J. [read post]