Search for: "Baxter Healthcare Corp"
Results 161 - 172
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
Cir. 2003) (citing Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
We have to admit that we’re scratching out heads about a recent decision out of Alabama that – contrary to everything else we’ve seen – concluded that the manufacturer of a branded drug could be liable in a case where it never sold the generic product that was all the plaintiff every took and thereby (allegedly) suffered injury.It’s not like this issue hasn’t been litigated before in Alabama.The first Alabama case we know of to consider the issue was Barnhill v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
By Hal WegnerBefore an overflow hearing room on an internationally available web broadcast, Chairman Howard Berman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee relevant to patents hosted a most informative and candid hearing yesterday afternoon joined by roughly ten of his committee colleagues, including Rep. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp, No. 08-60502 (5th Cir. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm
There is one less force of nature in the universe. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
It has been an interesting year in the world of expert witnesses. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 81 Cal. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
The Scripps declaration stated that of the $122,841 billed for plaintiff’s surgeries, PacifiCare paid $24,380, plaintiff paid $3,566, and the remaining $94,894 was “ ‘written off’ or waived by [Scripps] pursuant to the agreement between [Scripps] and the patient’s private healthcare insurer, in this case Pacificare PPO. [read post]