Search for: "Berman v. People" Results 161 - 180 of 306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am by Sandy Levinson
You don't have to articulate an administerable standard any more than you did in Bush v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:22 am by SHG
  Via Doug Berman, his decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
Douglas Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy discusses the importance and impact of the Court’s decisions last week in Missouri v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am by Kiran Bhat
Bonnie Goldstein of the Washington Post’s She The People blog looks at Tuesday’s arguments in Miller v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:02 am by azatty
As I recall, Dean Chemerinsky answered that it’s unfortunate that many people, especially since Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:35 am by Daniel Schwartz
Labor Relations Today has a good recap: In the order issued on Friday, March 2 in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:59 am by joseph bahgat
After spending several days hearing snippets of the prosecution's case in State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Berman puts a “sentencing spin” on the arguments at Sentencing Law and Policy. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm by Nabiha Syed
  And at Cato@Liberty, Ilya Shapiro previews the issues in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kiran Bhat
Holder and Florence v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 4:49 am by SHG
The scenario is the sort that would make for a great law school argument about the merit of a doctrine taken to its logical extreme, except that the logical extreme actually played out before the 9th Circuit in US v. [read post]