Search for: "Best v. Duke University"
Results 161 - 180
of 209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
Duke said the upgrades will cost about $80 million. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:05 pm
”10 This type of statement and its use is perhaps best described by way of example. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
After tensions over slavery and states’ rights led to the bloodiest conflict in American history, Congress divided on how best to rebuild the nation. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
And may the best team win.) [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 5:30 am
For example, when the Indiana Supreme Court affirmed a $325,000 verdict in a suit alleging assault and intentional infliction emotional distress claims in the 2008 case, Raess v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For example, my amicus brief in Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm
Some Interesting Info About the People Who Are Suing You: Bio of Tom Rosicki Tom is a graduate of Chaminade High School, here in Mineola; Duke University, where he majored in management science and accounting; and Touro Law School. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Collins, “A Considerable Surgical Operation”: Article III, Equity, and Judge-Made Law in the Federal Courts, Duke Law Journal 60(2):249-343 (2010). [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
Is the university a covered entity? [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
Meeks (D-NY), who noted that he had referred his niece to Bell’s organization, Bell was asked what disclosure would be best suited for new accredited investors. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
The ability of those officials to wield substantial federal power is at best questionable, and they certainly can’t wield unsupervised federal executive power. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Graetz & Greenhouse: Ron, you don’t mention Woodward and Armstrong’s The Brethren – controversial in its day (and a huge best-seller) that actually holds up very well. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
Investment bankers who used to do a bit of pre-shag chat by saying to women ‘We are the best of the best’ are not quite so confident these days in credit-crunch land. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
The best methods of discounting or distributional analysis will not help if applied to the wrong impacts. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
