Search for: "Blow v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 3,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:13 am by Emma Snell
Despite widespread fears in the tech community about such a blow, the justices’ arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Amichai Cohen, Yuval Shany
She characterized the reform as an “unrestrained attack on the legal system,” as a “critical blow” against judicial independence and impartiality, and as a “bad plan” that would change the democratic identity of the state of Israel, leaving it “unrecognizable. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
              In 1984, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called Graham v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
United States, 112 U.S. 536 (1884), struck a blow to the Chinese Exclusion Act, thereby protecting the rights of thousands of Chinese immigrant laborers. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am by Florian Mueller
By coincidence, that was the day the United States Department of Justice and eight state AGs filed a second Unite States et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Instead, a Trump-appointed Federalist Society judge chose to blow it all up. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
That said, it is possible to imagine circumstances in which the leaker of a SCOTUS opinion could be engaged in whistle blowing. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
She identifies no actual hinderance on whistle-blowing activities, and her employment and stalking-related concerns are too vaguely stated. [read post]