Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 10,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Appellant stated he understood and entered a plea of guilty. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:33 pm by Patent Docs
In addition, long having been considered a property right (Oil States to the recent contrary), patents have been bound to greater or lesser degrees with equitable considerations attendant on the transfer of property and proper limits thereof. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:20 am
Tellinghuisen, the Attorney General for the state of South Dakota, whose argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
We wonder, however, why we feel duty-bound to alert you to the new "pre-service removal" cases as they come down.Probably because no one else is paying attention to those cases, but they make an awful lot of difference to folks who toil in our field.Anyway, add Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Cl., Dec. 7, 2020), the Michigan Court of Claims "discrimination because of sex under the ELCRA includes discrimination because of an individual’s “gender identity,” and thus Interpretative Statement 2018-1 is valid to that extent....However, feeling itself bound by a prior state Court of Appeals decision, the court held:discrimination because of an individual’s “sexual orientation” is not prohibited under the ELCRA. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm by Josh Blackman
[This case really should be captioned United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
In holding that Congress could not validly abrogate state immunity for copyright infringement, the Fourth Circuit felt itself bound to follow the Court’s earlier decisions. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 11:57 am
They're not bound by the 30-day limit established in CCP 1710.40. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 6:01 pm by Gerard Magliocca
Justice Thomas recently wrote an interesting separate opinion in Gamble v. [read post]