Search for: "Bowles v. Wells" Results 161 - 180 of 538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2017, 8:36 am by Margaret Wood
  The court considered whether a goldfish was an article within the meaning of Section 154(1) of the Public Health Act and noted the ingenuity of rag and bone collectors of requiring children to bring their own bowls as a receptacle in which to put the goldfish, as handing out goldfish in bags or bowls would clearly be considered an article and there would be no ambiguity over the application of the section. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:07 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Melngailis allegedly stuck to her roots by ordering vegan bowls from a local Chipotle. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For example, in many law schools, the sky was falling when United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
    Careful what you consent to: Adwords and ArgosArgos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc [2017] EWHC 231(February 2017)Argos is a well-known UK High Street retailer. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
People transferred gold and silver to each other in order to satisfy important obligations as well as to obtain items of more direct and obvious use. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
Also, he points out that any changes to the trial conduct order determining the procedure for requesting expert witnesses, which the commission considered during the hearing yesterday, would affect 425 as well because the defense was previously denied expert assistance on the matter. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Both target policies and practices as well as individual acts of disparate treatment. [read post]