Search for: "C T CORPORATION" Results 161 - 180 of 7,754
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 8:34 pm by Jean O'Grady
I can’t recall any prior technology that has simultaneously trigged both of breathless enthusiasm and panicked resistance . [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:42 pm
And you can’t really blame him. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:42 pm
And you can’t really blame him. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:00 am by Bruce Nye
  But when it comes to corporate depositions, there are no exceptions to sections 2025.250(b) and (c). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:04 pm
  AT&T cited Exemption 7(C) in the Freedom of Information Act, which makes many federal records open to the public. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm by editor
Just because a subpoena is issued doesn’t mean it’s a legitimate exercise of government authority. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
If Lynn Stout were still alive, she would direct our attention to the rot in corporate culture that leads executives to calculate the cost of doing business with Michael Cohen only in dollars and in public relations risk, neglecting the wider cost to society of legal, no less than illegal, public corruption.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:16 am
AT&T [oral arguments transcript, PDF; JURIST report] on whether exemption 7(C) [DOJ backgrounder] of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [5 USC § 552] applies to corporations. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:07 am by Joe Kristan
JVT was a C corporation during 2005 but has since elected S corporation status. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 8:48 am by Kim Krawiec
» ___ Commentary: Puzzles About Corporate Boards and Board Diversity [Commentary] Donald C. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:47 pm by Mark M. Campanella, Esq.
The answer is actually suggested by the question itself, and is quite simple: you just don’t know. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:51 am
Ed. 401, 46 F.T.C. 1436 (1950) ("[C]orporations can claim no equality with individuals in the enjoyment of a right to privacy. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:33 am by Ryan Scoville
On this view, 1391(c)(3) doesn’t become inapplicable simply because there’s personal jurisdiction over the defendant. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 2:14 pm by Bilzin Sumberg and Anthony De Yurre
One of the main factors driving this growth is the relocation of companies and C-Suite executives from other parts of the country looking to capitalize on Miami’s advantages. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 10:52 am
Scott (Univ. of Canterbury), Kathleen Claussen (Univ. of Miami), Charles-Emmanuel Côté (Université Laval), & Atsuko Kanehara (Sophia Univ.) have published Changing Actors in International Law (Brill | Nijhoff 2020). [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, New York courts have ruled that employees of such other OTBs are not in the public service for the purposes of the Civil Service Law.In 1997 Article 10-C of the New York Health Care Corporations of the Public Authorities Law was amended by adding §§3300 – 3321 to create the Westchester County Health Care Corporation (WCHCC), a “public benefit corporation. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:49 pm by Alexander J. Davie
 Here’s how that should work (assuming this company is a C Corporation): The corporation would make payments of principal and interest back to the shareholders. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:10 pm
The Bureau found that Exemption 7(C) applied to individuals identified in AT&T’s submissions, but not to the company itself, because corporations do not have “personal privacy” interests as required by the exemption. [read post]