Search for: "California v. Pride" Results 161 - 180 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
It is impossible, I think, to justify in a system that celebrates the idea of all people counting equally–the notion of one person, one vote–the fact that Wyoming has the same two votes in the Senate as California, when the latter has something like 65 or 70 times the population. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:37 am by Charles O'Mahony
  See Fiona’s blog here on the recent ruling in California overturning proposition Number 8. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:50 am by Jessica Grigsby
The California Bicycle Coalition, based in Sacramento, also links to information and courses to teach bike safety. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In the years 2004 and 2005, IPBiz covered the Clyde Bryant v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Regents of University of California (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 160; Garrett v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:56 pm by Kim Krawiec
 In Free Fertility Foundation v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am by JB
Bringing a challenge to same-sex marriage to federal court in 2010 is a little like trying to get the federal courts to decide Lawrence in 1972 or Loving in 1948, immediately after California's decision in Perez v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm by Erin Miller
United Airlines (7th Cir. 1971); Regents of University of California v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm by Anna Christensen
   In addition, he voted in University of California v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm by azatty
And how do you square Terry v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
(TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court E D California: Court finds logo either protected as parody or not likely to cause confusion: Protectmarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. [read post]