Search for: "California v. Super. Ct."
Results 161 - 180
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 10:37 am
Ct. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
Super. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:41 pm
Super., Ct., 180 Cal. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
(See People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
., why does it satisfy the Daubert (federal) or Sargon Enterprises (California) test? [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
Super. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 6:49 am
Super. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
Another California state case, McVey v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 1:54 pm
So the malicious prosecution suit gets dismissed.That's indeed what I think California precedent holds.But let me nonetheless offer a critique of this position.As an outsider, I think there are two serious problems with this doctrine. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Ct., filed 6/22/2011). [read post]
31 May 2022, 1:14 pm
Super broadly, mind you. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:27 pm
Here in California and elsewhere. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:09 am
Ct. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit continues its apparent vacation -- only one published opinion since December 28, 2018 -- but. fortunately, the California Court of Appeal continues to crank things out.This opinion takes a very restrictive view of the litigation privilege. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm
In County of Sacramento v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
Dep’t Super. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
Maybe I am getting super old and incapable of reading opinions, or understanding cogent legal arguments. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:17 am
Ct. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
"The next couple of paragraphs also articulate a super-clear guide to the underlying issue and what the rest of the opinion is about. [read post]
