Search for: "Com. v. Justice, B." Results 161 - 180 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am by Peter Rost
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
” Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 41(b), 28 U.S.C.A.; U.S.Dist.Ct.Rules S.D.Ga., Rule 41.1(b). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:24 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Twist, 248 S.W.3d at 361; Neasbitt, 105 S.W.3d at 117.[7] FULL CASE STYLE: HUSSAIN ABDULWAHAB, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A FURNITURE GALAXY AND BAZAAR v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    The litigation arises out of the IPO laddering scandal from the dot com era. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am by Peter Rost
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Thomas wrote for Justice Scalia, and for Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito as to Parts I-B and II (this dissenting duo did not write separately). [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:57 pm by lopeznoriega
La minoría de los justices –integrada por Scalia, Alito, Thomas y Roberts- señaló que la decisión era incorrecta básicamente por el remedio que planteó la mayoría. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Brussels I and Arbitration Revisited - The European Commission’s Proposal COM(2010) 748 final - Martin Illmer Abstract: In December 2010, the European Commission presented its long-awaited proposal for a reformed Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:20 am by Russ Bensing
  And last week, in Connick v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
”[6] (b) Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC: the need for appropriate remedies as well as protection of bloggers If agreement of the kind described by Mr Justice Eady could be reached concerning the applicable law, why not also agreement about applicable remedies? [read post]